Category: Uncategorized

  • Where I Stand: A Clear Look at the Issues

    Where I Stand: A Clear Look at the Issues


    These responses came from a voter guide questionnaire—straightforward questions about where I stand on the issues. Rather than condense everything into quick bites, I’m sharing my full answers here. This is a clear look at my thinking, my priorities, and the kind of leadership I want to bring to Congress.


    What are the top three issues impacting Californians, and how would you address them as a lawmaker?

    The three major challenges that will continue to worsen if left unaddressed are polarization, climate change, and homelessness.

    Polarization has significantly damaged our ability to find solutions. I will work with any colleague acting in good faith to pass legislation that benefits constituents and strengthens our democracy. That includes restoring regular order in Congress—empowering committees, increasing transparency, and allowing for meaningful bipartisan deliberation.

    Climate change is a growing crisis. We are already experiencing the impacts through fires, floods, heatwaves, and rising costs. I will work with scientists, economists, and communities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while protecting economic stability. A healthy environment and a strong economy are deeply connected.

    Homelessness continues to impact Los Angeles in profound ways. The federal government can support efforts addressing poverty, healthcare, and mental health. We need compassionate, effective solutions that provide real support while recognizing that encampments cannot remain a permanent condition on our streets. 

    What role should the federal government play in how states conduct elections?

    U.S. elections are widely regarded as secure and accurate. The federal government should focus on protecting both voting access and election integrity.

    While there may be discussions in Congress about voter identification policies in the future, any effort must ensure that citizens are not unfairly restricted from voting. The goal should be to strengthen confidence in elections without creating unnecessary barriers. 

    What should the federal government prioritize when it comes to immigration?

    The federal government should prioritize comprehensive immigration reform.

    This includes creating a pathway to citizenship for long-term residents who have contributed to the workforce, as well as addressing the status of Dreamers. These individuals have built lives, skills, and communities here and deserve stability and opportunity.

    At the same time, border security remains important. Law enforcement should address cross-border crime such as trafficking and gang activity. We should also strengthen partnerships with countries in Central America to address the root causes of migration, including violence and economic hardship. 

    How would you push for federal disaster funding for California?

    California should take all necessary steps—including legal action—to secure disaster funding that has been promised.

    In addition to pursuing funding through the courts, we should also look to alternative sources of support when immediate needs arise. At the same time, California must strengthen its own financial resilience and infrastructure to prepare for future disasters, especially as climate-related events become more frequent. 

    Do you support banning stock trading for members of Congress and their families?

    Yes. I support a ban on trading individual stocks for members of Congress, their families, and their staff.

    Public servants should be fully focused on serving their constituents—not benefiting from insider knowledge or political connections. Establishing clear restrictions helps ensure integrity and restores public trust in government. 

    Do you support stronger regulations on pollution and carbon emissions?

    Yes. Our dependence on fossil fuels has long-term consequences for both public health and the environment.

    I will advocate for policies that reduce emissions while supporting innovation and economic stability. Addressing climate change requires collective action across industries, and with the right incentives, we can drive meaningful progress while creating new opportunities for growth. 

    Would you approve increased military spending?

    I support maintaining strong national defense, including funding for readiness such as equipment repair and resupply.

    However, additional funding should not be approved without proper congressional oversight. Congress must play an active role in shaping military strategy and ensuring accountability in how resources are used. 

    Under what circumstances should the U.S. engage in war?

    Military action should only be taken after careful consideration, including input from intelligence experts, military leadership, and Congress.

    Justifiable circumstances include defending allies, preventing terrorism, or protecting innocent people from severe harm. Even then, decisions must be made with a clear understanding of risks, outcomes, and long-term consequences. 

    Should a president seek congressional approval before engaging in military action?

    Yes, with very limited exceptions.

    In cases of immediate threat, a president may act quickly to protect lives. However, Congress must retain its authority and oversight role. Strengthening and enforcing existing frameworks, such as the War Powers Resolution, is essential to maintaining balance between branches of government. 

    Has Congress fulfilled its role as a check on the executive branch?

    No. Congress has not consistently exercised its full authority or accountability.

    Too often, decisions are driven by party interests rather than constituents. Restoring accountability means re-centering the role of Congress as a representative body that actively checks executive power and serves the public. 

    Should there be restrictions on social media use for young people?

    Yes. I support a ban on social media accounts for children under 16.

    As an educator and parent, I believe children deserve protection from harmful online environments. Limiting early exposure can support better mental health, social development, and overall well-being. 

    How would you address concerns about safety in communities?

    Public safety is fundamental. While crime rates may be declining, perception matters.

    Congress can support local efforts by investing in infrastructure that improves community environments—such as lighting, sidewalks, and small business development. Safe, active neighborhoods foster stronger communities and improve overall well-being. 

    Do you support term limits for members of Congress?

    No. Term limits do not address the root issues in government.

    The greater challenge is the influence of money and special interests. I will focus on reforming campaign finance, increasing accountability, and ensuring that elected officials remain responsive to their constituents. 

    What’s a hidden talent you have?

    I’m a natural negotiator and problem-solver.

    Growing up as a middle child taught me how to listen, find balance, and build consensus—skills that are essential in public service.



    No single document can cover everything—but this is a snapshot of how I think about the work ahead. I believe in showing up, doing the work, and staying accountable to the people I represent.

    Elizabeth Fenner

  • Nothing Is Broken

    Nothing Is Broken

    Nothing is broken. Bent, maybe. Certainly fixable.

    The “Broken” wording we are hearing these days is an actual program: some folks seem intent on making us accept certain things as true. Remember “weapons of mass destruction”? The ubiquity of that phrase in 2002 got under my skin — and ended up inoculating me from messaging overall, and it diminished my respect for most mainstream media. The latest manipulative term that has me talking back to the screen is “broken.” It seems to be applied it to everything—childcare, healthcare, the internet, education, the economy, the Fed, the Supreme Court, Congress. One wrapped it all up: “America is broken.” The worst effect of this is to keep us passive.

    Another problem with “broken” is that we live in a throwaway economy. Many things we buy aren’t meant to be repaired; when our toaster, microwave, washer, or dryer, coffee table stops working or looking nice, we are forced to discard it and buy a new one—another item designed to break again in a few years. So the use of “broken” suggests we should throw out the old model and start with something completely new. Burn it all down, they say.

    How we talk shapes how we think, so let’s think differently. Our American systems were built to endure and designed to evolve. Our government has solved so many problems. We have addressed blatant injustice and amended the Constitutional to make those fixes permanent. We have reduced—if not eliminated—discrimination, and built better systems that respect and protect individual freedom, safety, and access. We improved air quality and reversed ozone destruction. Our water is cleaner than ever, our food safer. We recognize that any “ism” holding us back—racism, sexism, ageism, nationalism, nativism—must be confronted.

    I won’t deny we’ve taken a hit in the last twenty years. We are not problem free, and the issues to solve now are as serious as they have ever been. “Broken” makes us think of all the things we can’t do to fix things. But We can solve problems if we listen to each other, if we are open to new ideas and ways of thinking, if we respect each other, and come to an understanding that respects what we all want and need. I think we are ready for solutions — we are ready to start solving these fixable problems.

    One of the ways I distinguish myself as a candidate—and will as a Representative—is by refusing to adopt anyone’s talking points. I won’t ask you to listen to canned wording or sign on to party messaging. There’s more to say about that, but for now I’ll say this: Stop calling us broken. America has been through worse — with many troubles of our own making — and we have emerged better and stronger, every time.

    We just need to get realistic, talk most to the people who have to deal with the systems, in the systems. I will work doggedly to get American systems back on track, guided by the perspectives, values, and experiences of real people—not donors, PACs, or special interests.

    I’m convinced we can return to a country that enjoys amazing goods and services of all kinds. The fixing needs doing from the household to the federal government. I have a mind for solutions, and I’m convinced we can solve our problems. Let’s get to work.